Recently, I was a guest on the Shaun Proulx Show on Proud Fm. I was there to discuss Saskatchewan possibly making it legal for marriage commissioners to refuse to perform ceremonies for same-sex couples. I was ready for a lively conversation when I had a thought: the Michael Jackson Memorial is being broadcast around the planet…will anyone be listening to us?
I mentioned this to Shaun and Mark Wigmore when I arrived at the studio and we made a bit of a joke about the 6 people who would be tuning in to us. I then said something to the effect, “Well, the world is wallowing in an incredible amount of media-created mourn porn.” We all got a laugh out of that and went on to do the interview.
“The world is wallowing in an incredible amount of media-created mourn porn.”
On the way home I thought about what had inadvertently slipped out of my mouth. Mourn Porn. I then applied it to the crescendo of mourning over Jackson’s death. From the first reports of his cardiac arrest to the very public memorial, this whole thing was very operatic – and pornographic.
I remember when Elvis died. I remember the outpouring of emotion. But I don’t remember nearly two weeks of program-preempting special reports and “coverage”. The same when John Lennon was killed. It was a big news story and a lot of the kids I went to high school with were wearing black arm bands for a couple of days. One of our teachers actually suspended regular class and brought in Beatles and Lennon records (that’s right, I said records!) to listen to his music and discuss his influence on music, pop culture and the peace movement.
However, the Michael Jackson send off was over-the-top. It was Dianaesque. It was even bigger. It’s not that his fans were necessarily acting inappropriately; reaction to the death of a beloved entertainer can have a profound effect of people. It was the media that acted like a rabid Larry Flint. Breaking news updates, TV specials, up-to-the-minute updates on the latest sordid tales (true or not). Then there was the Twitter and Facebook aspect.
Of course, the death of a celebrity is big business. While the media reported on the tragic events that lead up to Jackson’s death with put-on sad faces, they woud perk up when talking about the spectacular album sales that were taking place since his passing, speculating on just how many millions this could bring in.
I think the image burned in brain is that of his daughter Paris on the news this morning. Here is this poor child who has been sheltered from the media her whole life suddenly being thrust into a very public spotlight during the most horrible moment in her life. The audience in the Staples Centre watching her every move and listening to her every strained and emotional word, her family holding her and telling her to speak up, the cameras’ and spotlights’ unrelenting stare as she struggled to speak. The live feed beamed around the planet. It made me sad and very uncomfortable to see – and I didn’t watch it live, I saw the pictures on the news this morning.
Our society, indeed our planet, has an unquenchable thirst for this. We need to wallow in every nuance of someone else’s grief. Therefore the media give us what we want. But what’s the cost? I’ve seen people more distraught over Jackson’s death than they were when a member of their own family died. Is it a cultural zeitgeist? Is it a necessary expression of emotions bourne out of our own fear of death. Is it the media cashing in on the spectacle by putting the camera absolutely everywhere and showing everything raw, bare and uncensored? Or, is it simply the new phenomenon of Mourn Porn?